Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Glancing briefly at the wad of junk mail daily stuffed inside our mailbox, my attention was grabbed by a flashy, glossy color insert courtesy of the folks at Jack In The Box, who are currently hawking both a revamped "late night" drive thru menu and their venture into the realm of Mexican food. And if you didn't think Mexican food could get more half-assed than Taco Bell's Volcano Taco, think again. Or should I say, look closer at the image I've helpfully pasted above. What caught my eye was the fact that Jack In The Box features a crunchy shell taco (we're already far from the realm of la auténtica comida mexicana, but wait for it) featuring a single slice of American Processed Cheese almost thoughtfully tucked into the side of each taco shell. It looks absurd in the officially-sanctioned corporate advertising photo, and I can't imagine how foul it looks in real life. I picture it drooping, in a quickly-congealing lump of yellow-orange, across the brittle taco shell, breaking apart in one chunk with the first tentative bite.
Never mind the fact that cheese plays a very small role in authentic tacos. Never mind the fact that when cheese does make a rare appearance, it is typically in the form of the very mild and crumbled queso blanco. I'll even be willing to admit that American-style tacos, from Southern California to the Texas border, are often smothered in cheese and taste none the worse for it. But even the barbarians have the common decency to shred the stuff before handing the taco over.
Looking at such horrors, I remind myself that much of the country remains stranded in what I've dubbed the Malo Corridor of Mexican Food, a zone buffeted on the one hand by junkfood chains like Taco Bell, Taco John's or Del Taco and on the other by grinningly genteel "casual dining" Mexican-American restaurants with all-English menus, deep-fried burritos, enormous taco salads and Super Nachos. It's largely what I grew up with passing for Mexican food, with two greasy crunchy tacos and a pintos 'n cheese from Taco Bell after soccer practice fixing my jones, or a family visit to Chi Chi's in Appleton in the pre-Hepatitis A days, or any number of countless and now-forgotten interchangeable variations on cheese-drenched platters with mild side-optional salsas.
And yet, the taco revolution continues to spread, north and east. Those of us ensconced safely within the borders of Southern California may feel smug when it comes to authentic border food, but as the country's Hispanic population expands and shifts, better food follows. I was first struck by this a few summers ago visiting my wife's family in Walla Walla, Washington. Hardly a bastion of Hispanic culture, the region nevertheless has seen a large influx of Latino families, especially during the harvest season when the valley sags under the weight of wheat and sweet onions. A surprising addition to Walla Walla has been the presence of several competing and rather excellent taco trucks setting up residences in various locations, such as El Taco Loco, parked in front of the Melody Muffler and offering an authentic menu like lengua tacos for cheap. Similar stories are being told in regions of the rural Midwest, long forced to subside on Mexican Pizzas and bland jars of Pace Picante Sauce and now boasting solid offerings of tacos sudados or tacos al pastor (and perhaps even glasses of horchata). The reasons for this steady influx of new immigrants aren't necessarily positive ones - far too often, the work bringing new immigrants is dangerous, non-unionized and exhausting, thus dominated by recent arrivals lacking a solid education. But if any positives are to be found among the many crimes committed by Nebraska pig farms or Kansas livestock operations, the cultivation of self-sustaining Hispanic communities among formerly lily-white farming towns may be one.
There's more to the story than taco trucks, of course. Chefs like Rick Bayless have been drawing attention to the possibilities of combining authentic Mexican fare with gourmet techniques for years, and his 1987 book Authentic Mexican: Regional Cooking from the Heart of Mexico is a landmark text. Yet I can't help but feel that we're at yet another tipping point in culinary history when more Americans than ever before are sampling real or nearly-real approximations of Mexican cuisine, from five-course dinners to 75 cent street tacos. While there remains an almost overwhelming dependence upon processed taco junk, it's also never been easier to sample a cabeza taco.
San Diego's taco scene is less well-defined than our big brother to the north, where a vital taco truck following and a much larger Hispanic population has combined to create a nearly unprecedented American variation on street food culture. We San Diegans still rely on local chains like Roberto's (dubbed "Regretto's" by those in the know unlucky enough to have spent an evening or two with upset stomachs after devouring a greasy burrito) and many even partake of national chains. But the real taco lovers among us traverse the city to locate new roach coaches, grimy walk-up taco stands and refined variations on traditional recipes. Although far from complete, the following list offers a handful of must-try taco destinations in our fair city.
TABE taco trucks traverse the greater San Diego region, offering Chef Todd Ichinaga's Korean-Mexican fusion to mobile eaters, including bbq chicken tacos dredged in Teriyaki and Maui salsa, Bass ale battered fish tacos, and vegan offerings for those interested. The salsa bar alone at Mama Testa Taqueria in Hillcrest is worth a visit, and while tourists flock to sample the fish tacos that famously beat Bobby Flay's on a recent Food Network program, I recommend the Mama Cesta or "steamed tacos" - especially the mashed potato-filled en papas. The Linkery's menu changes daily, but one can usually find a scrumptious taco filled with a housemade sausage link with navy beans, while their recent "Tijuego" gastro-cantina spin-off, El Take It Easy, dives further into the tradition, with grilled pork belly tacos and rabbit taquitos alongside three variations on micheladas. Brave the grime and grit outside La Posta de Acapulco's Taco Shop on Third Avenue in Hillcrest and you'll be rewarded with one of the richest carne asada tacos in town. My wife swears by the rolled tacos smothered in gaucamole and shredded cheese at Ocean Beach's Nico's, and while the nonstop ID-checking and sports bar atmosphere of nearby South Beach Bar & Grille is obnoxious, for once they're not lying when they talk up the quality of their seafood tacos, from mahi mahi and wahoo to shark and lobster. 30th and Adams' Cantina Mayahuel whips together tasty $4.50 tacos, with my favorite being the lime-marinated sirloin taco filled with shredded cabbage-carrot-cilantro, washed down with one (or two) of their 145 tequilas. Also strong on the tequila front is the decidedly upscale El Vitral on J Street, with a mushroom, white corn, poblano and cheese taco starter especially memorable. Touristy and far too busy for me, the taquitos at India Street's El Indio are nevertheless a San Diego institution, with Ralph Pesqueira Jr. presiding over the sixty-year old home of the original rolled taco. Any number of astonishingly awesome taco stops could be made in the Barrio Logan neighborhood, but I'll give a nod to Las Cuatro Milpas (heavenly carnitas tacos with truly hot hot sauce) and the freshly-fried fish tacos at Rivas on Logan Avenue. While they also serve up tacos for carnivores, the real draw at Ranchos Cocina (OB and North Park locations) are the veg/vegan-friendly offerings, such as tofu or nopales tacos. And for some real street-food fun, track down the good folks running the MIHO Gastrotruck, with an ever-changing menu that doesn't always feature tacos (their veggie poutine is, thankfully, a constant) but has served up in the past Yucatan-inspired cochinita pibil tacos filled with spicy pickled red onion (and don't forget to ask for the Mexican coca cola, one glass bottle of cane sugar and absolutely no high-fructose corn syrup goodness).
I guarantee none of these places will insult you by tucking a slice of processed cheese into anything you order.
Monday, July 12, 2010
We then poured the hot brandy syrup up to the rim of the jars. And what a wonderful aroma of hot fruit, brandy, cinnamon and orange filled the kitchen!
All the while, I was busy setting about prepping my end of the bargain - pickling cucumbers from the garden. We would only have enough for two jars this time around, but the amount of effort needed to organize the vinegar, mustard seeds, dill, garlic and hot peppers was still notable.
We had enough herbs picked to fill four trays on the food dehydrator, even though the garden itself looked like we'd barely made a dent. Drying oregano and parsley was a bit time consuming, partly due to the rather low temperature required (95 degrees). We set up the equipment in the late afternoon and let it hum away all night, until around noon the following day, when we decided it was approaching an acceptable level of bone-dryness.
However, we were lucky enough to meet up with head honcho Farmer Joe (it's what he calls himself) at our JR Organics CSA stand, where he periodically stops by to chat up the Hillcrest Farmer's Market shoppers, which very often include local chefs and restaurateurs. Hearing that Jane planned on pickling today, he tossed in for free a tall stalk of fresh flowered dill, and recommended adding the flowers to the very top of our jars. They were lovely, and we gladly accepted this free gift. The benefits of knowing the man who grows your food!
But as I set about once again dicing the cukes and peeling the garlic, Jane set about yet another concurrent project. We had a large amount of rhubarb left over from a 4th of July pie she had made and brought to Twentynine Palms, and a glance through our preserving cookbooks turned up a recipe for Sweet Pickled Damson Plums, easily modified to incorporate rhubarb. A little cider vinegar, a cinnamon stick, allspice berries and orange zest were brought to a boil, while sugar and chunks of rhubarb were added and softened. The rhubarb was placed inside the jars....
Thursday, July 8, 2010
What's that you say? Didn't know Helen Thomas was Arab-American? While she was born in Kentucky, both parents hailed from Syria (Tripoli, to be exact, now part of Lebanon) and the family name was anglicized at Ellis Island from Antonious to Thomas. While Thomas has never drawn exceeding amounts of attention to this fact (actually distancing herself from any attempt at hyphenating her ethnicity), she has spoken frankly of incidents during school in which she came home in tears after being taunted as a "foreigner" and a "garlic-eater". I'm willing to respect Thomas' desire to avoid applying needless focus on her ethnicity, so why not simply examine her accomplishments? That would be covering all presidential administrations between Eisenhower and Obama; being named the first female officer of the National Press Club; the first female member and eventual president of the White House Correspondents' Association; and the first female member of the Gridiron Club.
Thomas perhaps became best known through her combination of sheer longevity in the journalism business, and her rather overt decision to embrace a more controversial and accusatory line of questioning in the spring of 2000. This decision, she has since made clear, had everything to do with her abrupt resignation from United Press International (UPI) and her move to Hearst Newspapers. Her UPI resignation came after an announcement that the news organization was about to be purchased by News World Communications, the side project and property of Unification Church leader and celebrity-courting fraud Rev. Sun Myung Moon. Freed from the constraints of UPI reportage, Thomas let her feelings fly. These feelings notably found a wide target in the George W. Bush administration, and while I suspect Thomas wouldn't have wasted her time much playing favorites with either political party, there was a sense of mutual contempt between questioner and questioned.
That is, when Thomas was actually getting called on. From the start, Thomas' insistence that Israel be held to the same exacting standards applied by the United States to other countries did not sit well with the administration or, indeed, much of the Washington press corps or Georgetown elite. Ari Fleischer notably claimed Thomas held "strong views on the Middle East" - as if every other Washington insider has only vaguely heard of the place and couldn't commit to offering an opinion for the public record. And while an autograph-seeker and moonlighting sports columnist for The Daily Breeze managed to get Thomas uttering some disdainful commentary about George W. Bush ("worst president in American history") and Dick Cheney ("a liar") which he quickly published, Thomas did apologize to the president and rarely let her emotions get the better of her. Having said this, I'm sure she was a royal pain in the ass for Ari Fleischer and other Bush press corps minions. Her bias only added to her mystique.
All this is lots of fun for wonks and Washington observers, but I would note a darker edge to the typical back-and-forths between reporters and know-nothing press handlers. On July 18, 2006, Thomas sharply questioned now-deceased Press Secretary Tony Snow on the ongoing Lebanon War, then at its peak and eventually to lay claim to the deaths of 1,500 Lebanese civilians and the displacement of one million Lebanese and 500,000 Israelis. In her questioning, Thomas noted that the United States could have applied greater pressure on Israel in an effort to slow or ease the bombardment of Lebanon. "Thank you for the Hezbollah view," Snow quickly responded. Consider this glib remark for a moment - a seasoned reporter of Arab heritage asking about appropriate levels of diplomatic pressure being applied in order to ease civilian deaths is accused of being a mouthpiece for a Shi'a Islamist paramilitary organization identified by the United States as a terrorist organization. Even during the darkest years of the Bush administration, contempt for the press rarely reached such lows.
Clearly, Helen Thomas had some issues with the current actions of the State of Israel. In this she is hardly alone, although her position of power as a noted journalist did distinguish her. However, to accuse her of anti-Semitism or even anti-Israel rhetoric on the basis of such remarks seems rather dubious, reeking of the same mentality that paints anybody questioning the need to go to war as a traitor (while, oddly enough, often elevates tax evaders to the status of genuine patriots). Even the most reactionary media watchdog group couldn't hope to turn a few tough questions into grounds for dismissal. They would have to bide their time, and hope that in the age of Twitter and 24-hour news, the smoking gun would surface eventually.
And surface it did, in the unlikely form of a shaky video taken by Rabbi David Nesenoff outside a White House-sponsored Jewish Heritage Celebration Day, in which Thomas was asked for her thoughts on Israel. What followed is a dismaying, somewhat-incoherent, and utter p.r. disaster of a rant - ill-conceived, juvenile, risible. "Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine," she opined, and after being urged on by Nesenoff, she added Israeli Jews should "go home" to "Poland," "Germany," "America" and "everywhere else". She was quickly rushed away into a waiting vehicle while a supposedly astonished Nesenoff posted the footage to his website the following week. I have no reason to suspect Nesenoff of being disingenuous when he claims to have had no inkling of Thomas' views on Israel before approaching her with video camera in hand, but given his own activities as a blogger and "bias consultant" (his term, not mine), dispatched to counsel Mel Gibson after the washed-up actor's drunken anti-Semitic rant made the headlines, I find it hard to believe he didn't suspect he might uncover something juicy when he stopped Thomas on her way from the White House event. The speed with which Nesenoff made the rounds of talk shows and newspapers also suggested at least some amount of media savvy, as he referred to her comments as a "vile paradigm of hate talk" and claimed she "thought the Jews should leave Israel and return to the final solution".....which isn't really all that accurate, but certainly makes for a memorable soundbite.
I'm inclined to agree with Rabbi Nesenoff that telling Jews to go back to Germany represents a rarefied height of insensitivity and historical ignorance, and that any supposedly rational human being who would spew forth such nonsense is worthy of our contempt, if not our attention. I suppose one could make the case over the course of a two-hour symposium or a thirty page research article that there is a supreme irony in one of the most persecuted and suffering cultures in world history contributing to the suffering of others through widescale displacement and the creation of refugees. One might put forth a discussion examining the future of Zionism and how it might manifest itself outside the state of Israel, and indeed how countries such as Germany and Poland could have their Jewish communities restored. It's a discussion requiring prolonged discourse, enormous reserves of compassion and an awareness of the weight of history. It is not something to spit into a video camera in a sixty-second exchange.
So while I can't label the fall of Helen Thomas a witch hunt, I do believe there were many people on the sidelines eager to see her go and willing to fan the flames. Her ridiculous comments may forever overshadow her other accomplishments, and as the White House Correspondents' Association washes their hands of her as an "indefensible," I hear that the Society of Professional Journalists is thinking of renaming their "Helen Thomas Award for Lifetime Achievement" for somebody less worthy of contempt.
I hadn't planned on writing about Thomas' ignoble departure at this or any other length, with a few conversations on the matter with friends and family serving as enough exploration of the matter. But when I read the news of Octavia Nasr being canned, things started getting interesting again. The Senior editor of Middle Eastern Affairs at CNN was abruptly fired yesterday after tweeting that she "respected" recently deceased Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah. The three-day fallout leading to her termination was mercifully brief, but long enough for me to think, "There goes another Arab-American journalist." A Lebanese immigrant, Nasr was born in Beirut, worked twenty years at CNN, and was a recipient of the Edward R. Murrow Award, among others. While my CNN-watching days are long behind me, she always seemed the rare informed individual among the morass of cable news petulance. I suspect that in a desperate attempt to remain relevant in our changing information landscape, various CNN anchors and commentators were urged to spread the word via Facebook and Twitter, get their hands dirty with a little cutting-edge social media, tweet and post and don't ever let 'em forget you're out there. Anchors acquiesced. Nobody paid attention until one of them screwed up.
Yet how, exactly, did Nasr screw up? I'm far from an expert on Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, and much of his track record seems dismayingly familiar to anybody even dimly aware of Hezbollah and Middle Eastern politics - Holocaust deniers are practically par for the course. But we should be willing to agree that Nasr was not praising Fadlallah's views on these or other matters, but on Fadlallah's rather remarkable liberal views on the role of women within Islamic society. These were notable indeed - fatwahs issued against honor killings and female circumcision, and calls for the right of women to defend themselves against any act of violence, be it physical or social violence. Additionally, Fadlallah insisted that women were the equal of men and that female individuals should be seen as role models for both men and women. Such talking points may seem rather quaint in our supposedly enlightened society (or so we like to tell ourselves), but coming from a notable marja', a figure only below that of the Quran, the Prophets and the Imams in regards to authority on religious law, they were somewhat astonishing.
This is clearly the aspect of Fadlallah that Ms. Nasr was referring to when she composed and transmitted the following tweet on July 4th; "Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah.. One of Hezbollah's giants I respect a lot..." Within hours, several media watchdog groups had seized upon the tweet as evidence of colossal bias and stupendous anti-Semitism on the part of Ms. Nasr (you'll forgive me if I suggest that these watchdog groups may have been some of the few followers of Nasr's Twitter account?) and unsurprisingly, Nasr quickly offered up an apology by way of the now-cliched "error of judgement" statement. The following day, she was canned by CNN. "We believe that her credibility in her position as senior editor for Middle Eastern affairs has been compromised going forward," claimed the network's senior vice president for newsgathering in the typically mind-numbing language currently masquerading as our mother tongue.
Can anybody offer up anything positive coming from such a hasty overreaction to a fairly innocuous tweet? Aren't all tweets fairly innocuous by design? If Helen Thomas' comments were shocking in their unfiltered vehemence, Nasr's seem barely shrug-worthy. How much depth can one plumb, especially regarding an individual life, in the Twitter-mandated format of 140 characters (140 words would barely be enough)? If being audacious enough to express any hint of respect or even non-loathing for a recently deceased individual, in any capacity or for any reason, can easily be seen as offering support for the annihilation of Israel, our culture has succeeded in gagging any possibility of holding adult conversations on any matter involving the Middle East.
Lest anyone doubt my personal beliefs or good politics, let me be unusually frank here and toss ambiguity out the window (sorry, Prof. Dintenfass!). I'll support any effort to combat the scourge and obscenity that is anti-Semitism, from rooting it out of the mainstream media or from under the rock where the lowest blogs fester. The closest I've ever come in my adult life to getting in a fist fight was when a co-worker disdainfully referred to a dishonest customer as "acting Jewish" in my presence. I'll cast any available stones at those who would claim willful ignorance of history or would attempt to paint the original motivations behind Zionism and the founding of the State of Israel as anything other than a necessary action for ethnic and cultural survival. I consider Holocaust deniers, doubters or dismissers to be lower than vomit. But please don't insult my intelligence by parsing every other verb for possible inappropriateness or yanking comments so far out of context they get slammed with decompression sickness. Bias can move in more than one direction, you know.
A final thought, tangentially related. The great novelist, activist, Nobel Laureate and Holocaust survivor Eli Wiesel is not a figure I'd dare accuse of insensitivity. Yet he has courted some degree of controversy recently by taking out full page ads in various mainstream American newspapers. This extended letter/essay spoke at length of his belief that the city of Jerusalem lacks any true Muslim connection, and he urged the current White House administration not to apply "pressure" to Israel regarding giving up settlement expansion in the city. Jerusalem, he says, "is mentioned more than six hundred times in Scripture—and not a single time in the Koran". He adds, "For me, the Jew that I am, Jerusalem is above politics".
One understands where Wiesel is coming from. But I wonder if Wiesel had chosen to tweet a comment as absurd, contentious and simplistic as "Jerusalem is above politics" - to make such a claim about a city created in its modern state through politics of the most extraordinary degree - if any watchdog groups might have pounced on the matter? I'm aware of an open letter, signed by over one hundred Jews currently dwelling in Jerusalem, who have attacked Wiesel on this and other various other points in his ad. The full text can be read on their website, Just Jerusalem / Sheikh Jarrah, in which they lay out exactly why they feel bitter when American citizens hold Jerusalem up as an emblem or a symbol while leaving the actual facts of living in the city to others. It's a worthy response - mannered, measured, suitably outraged, informed, concerned. And I hadn't heard a word about the entire affair until the New York Review of Books re-published the open letter in late May. Neither Helen Thomas nor Octavia Nasr could be mistaken for Eli Wiesel. But I'd like to think Nasr deserved something like an open letter of rebuke rather than the three-day media frenzy she got.
LATE EDIT, 07/09/2010: and it keeps going.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
[image created by yours truly via photo-manipulation of video upload]
Anybody with cable access to Comedy Central (or The Comedy Channel) in the early 1990s couldn't help but stumble across seemingly endless performance footage of the comedian Gallagher, looped and streaming forth during any and all hours of the day or night. You know the guy I'm talking about, even if you're lucky enough to blank at the name recognition - the sort-of-Frank-Zappa-looking-dude with an act primarily revolving around the smashing of inanimate objects via wooden mallet (dubbed the "Sledge-O-Matic"), most notably watermelons. It was easy to forget that audiences, their front rows often draped in protective plastic covering, sat through over an hour's worth of Gallagher's more mundane observational stand-up brand of comedy before the spectacular dénouement of messy smash and bash. And while it may have been the watermelon-destruction that solidified Gallagher's reputation as a fail-safe entertainer of the 1980s and 1990s, I always noted that almost 90 percent of his act consisted of somewhat sluggish, non-daring verbal comedy of the snarky and "ever-notice" school (although noticeably clean, as continually pointed out by many vocal fans over the years).
As a teenager, I must admit to initially enjoying the physical aspect of Gallagher's comedy, getting a kick out of the splatter of fruit and milk containers. Who wouldn't at that age? The rest of his act seemed pretty pedestrian, and I often found myself drifting towards thoughts of, say, Richard Lewis. Eventually, Gallagher's spots started to appear less and less on the expanding Comedy Central network, and soon this mustachioed figure receded (in my mind, at least) to the level of late-80s nostalgia, nudged somewhere in levels of cultural importance between Crocodile Dundee and Alf. When I came across a capsule review by Rob Patterson from an early- 80s reference source - "so-called comedian...his jokes are the product of a truly banal mentality, and Gallagher's delivery is that of a precious twit" - I at first found the sentiments a bit harsh, then quickly nodded in agreement. For years afterward, whenever my mind strayed to thoughts of Gallagher (which was not very often, dear readers), my mind immediately assented "so-called comedian".
End of story, or so I thought. For it seems that Gallagher has recently "re-invented" himself as a comedian delivering a decidedly un-banal brand of humor that, while still "clean" (whatever that means), has veered sharply into the realm of extreme right-wing politics (fine with me) and pure, untrammeled queer-bashing (not so fine with me).
Lindy West of Seattle's weekly alternative newspaper The Stranger recently penned an article recounting Gallagher's performance at the Admiral Theater, and it reads like a piece of immersion journalism - an undercover look and infiltration of a radical conglomeration or a vaguely millenarian society. Except that no infiltration was necessary - West simply attended a sold-out show in a Seattle suburb by a moderately established "comedy legend". And while attendees could still count on getting drenched with detritus from the Sledge-O-Matic, ticket buyers could also be greeted with sneering lines like this one, hurled at a young man in the front row: "You have your hat on backward. Are you a homosexual? Because it seems you have a problem figuring out the front from the back".
West's piece deserves to be read in its entirety - here's the link. Because this is not simply an example of a few off-color remarks tossed aside to make sure the audience is paying attention or to shore up some "comedy is dangerous" bona fides. Gallagher's entire act now seems to revolve around endless rancor directed towards the gay community. West seems equally distressed at the nasty right-wing politics also present during the performance, such as Gallagher's pronouncement that Obama "ain't black. You're a latte. You're half whole-milk. It could be goat milk—you could be a terrorist!" Or his complaint regarding Guantanamo Bay, running along the lines of, "We weren't even allowed to torture all the way. We had to half-torture—that's nothin' compared to what Saddam and his two sons OOFAY and GOOFAY did". Dumb as this stuff is, I can't work up too much outrage or bile over our political differences - political comedy is, by definition, only amusing to the flattered parties. But the unrelenting homophobia, utterly devoid of nuance or wit - "Without God, we are nothing but dust. What is butt dust? Is that what you get if your homosexual isn't properly lubricated?" - becomes almost numbing.
In the end, even Gallagher's grand finale of family-friendly destruction can't help but include a few nauseating nods towards no-holds-barred bigotry. Pouring first an oversized jar of Chinese vegetables and then another of fruit cocktail into a tin pan, he hoists his hammer and announces, "This is the China people and queers!!!" before drenching the front row.
West doesn't recount any incident of audience walkouts during the Bremerton performance, which doesn't mean there weren't any - just that they weren't numerous. Maybe Gallagher's audience knows exactly what they're in for these days, and it sounds like plenty are lapping it up. But if Michael Richards' ill-fated meltdown at the Laugh Factory can become a cultural meme, then Gallagher's celebration of unapologetic gay hatred deserves similar notoriety. While he remains as unfunny as he was back in his late 80s "heyday," I guess at least Gallagher can finally refute the banality charge once levelled against him by Rob Patterson. Only what was that Hannah Arendt said about the banality of evil?
Friday, July 2, 2010
During my sophomore year in college, perusing the bookshelves somewhere on the third floor of the Seeley G. Mudd Library as I so often did in those days, I stumbled across a fat, red hardcover book bearing the moderately authoritarian title Christgau's Record Guide. Inside, I found 470 pages of dense script featuring capsule reviews of 1970s albums/records/recordings, followed by letter grades. Being a sucker for rock criticism at the time, I checked it out and began toting it with me to the cafeteria, campus benches, and local restaurants. I quickly discovered this volume was far more than just another collection of slapdash record reviews or some type of supplement to the likes of The Rolling Stone Album Guide (in either its Dave Marsh or Anthony De Curtis manifestation). Even a hurried glance at any page confirmed my initial suspicion that this Christgau character wasn't interested in offering biographical details or even placing the individual artist into easily-digestible frameworks. He expected you to show up with a functioning level of appreciation and awareness, he wouldn't dare insult your intelligence, and he expected you to do some close reading. In this respect, he resembled favorite writers and critics from my current studies in the English Literature department more than any "mere" music critic. In fact, it was Christgau who alerted me to the possibilities available to any gifted writer - that subject matter counts less than compositional ability.
It was only later that I realized this record guide was no mere one-off but a collection of monthly "Consumer Guide" columns that ran in The Village Voice and, to a lesser extent, Newsday and Creem throughout the 1970s. What's more, he had never stopped - I discovered a 1980s Record Guide at the Menasha Public Library that summer and came across electronic editions of the current Village Voice running new monthly columns throughout 1998 and 1999. This was no small discovery, because it offered a second revelation of sorts - the possibility of cultural critics remaining engaged with mass and popular culture long after the individual writers had ceased playing any sort of immediate role within a so-called youth culture. By 1998, Christgau was clearly on the wrong side of twenty, or thirty, or forty (I wasn't sure exactly). But he was writing about contemporary music, including teen pop and hip-hop, with an enthusiasm and (this is key) an awareness that transcended age. It's startling now to look back at myself at age twenty-one and see how easily I might have become locked into an ossified critical credo that rejected certain basic strands of musical creativity while foolishly elevating minor variations on niche genre experimentation at the expense of others. I've since met otherwise intelligent individuals whose musical tastes run unfailingly across strictly demarcated lines of "good' and "bad," in which the "bad" often encompasses huge swaths of black pop or contemporary rap, or the "good" barely acknowledges anything not 1981-1988 era hardcore. While it may sound hyperbolic, the cultivation of an encyclopedic musical knowledge has become something like a moral necessity in my mind.
But all that's neither here nor there. My appreciation of Christgau ultimately stems from the fact that his writing caught my fancy and continued to hold my interest as I matured and journeyed forth from the Midwest to the Northeast and the West Coast. Even more importantly, his reviews helped introduce me to a wide variety of music, both old and new, that might otherwise have never come my way. When Christgau's tastes during the mid-1980s took a decisive shift to include the world of Afropop, I'm sure he confused and even alienated many followers who couldn't see the connection between American-based r&b and, say, the Bhundu Boys. I recall skipping over many of those reviews myself as I raced to find opinions on Gang of Four or The Replacements. But when my own interests started wavering in the direction of the melodic, insistently rhythmic, and gently propulsive offerings that is Afropop's gift to the world (sometime in my late twenties, and especially so in my early thirties), it was Christgau's treasure trove of insight on the matter that helped fill my shelves with the likes of King Sunny Ade and Luambo Franco.
So it came as bittersweet news yesterday that Christgau was pulling the plug on the Consumer Guide once and for all, after 41 years of near-continuous monthly appearances. Much of the work has been collected in individual volumes dedicated to decades, but perhaps a better way to experience the full breadth of his accomplishment is to visit his website, which features, among many other things, complete Consumer Guide columns in chronological order going back to the very first, in the July 10th edition of the Village Voice. Taken together, these Consumer Guide reviews offer as studied and as rewarding an investigation into popular culture as any one critic could muster. As I've written before in this space, they deserve to one day be collected within the pages of The Library of America. At the very least, his Consumer Guide mini-reviews should enjoy healthy circulation among electronic-based enthusiasts who may well marvel at the possibilities available once upon a time to a school of writing and criticism - dense, erudite, refined yet profane, scholastic, unapologetically political, witty, acerbic, fearless and often quite kind - that has little place in our increasingly post-literate cultural landscape.
Anyway. In brief recognition of forty-one years of work, may I offer an attempt at a tribute? The opening pages of Christgau's Consumer Guide: Albums of the 90s includes this dedication:
This book is dedicated to everyone who's ever written to thank me for turning him or her on to a record. If I haven't responded, I'm sorry. It always means a lot - in fact, it helps keep me going.
Now might be as good a time as any to thank him for fifteen recordings that might otherwise have never entered heavy-rotation in our house.
Gogol Bordello - Super Taranta!
Buck 65 - Talkin' Honky Blues
Old 97s - Fight Songs
DJ Yoda - Fabriclive.39
Randy Newman - 12 Songs
Orchestra Baobab - Pirate's Choice
Brakes - The Beatific Visions
The Go-Betweens - Before Hollywood (or all of them, really)
Orlando Cachaito Lopez - Cachaito
Steinski - What Does It All Mean?
Mountain Goats - Tallahassee
Sonny Sharrock - Guitar
Mekons - OOOH! (out of our heads)
Franco & Rochereau - Omana Wapi